This discussion always draws public criticism whenever the National Mid-Term Legislation Program and annual priorities are set. Mainly to the results of the legislative achievements that are not satisfactory. This is based on the Draft Law's low quantity and declining quality achievements. This failure requires an evaluation and the discovery of models and solutions due to problems that hinder the implementation of the National Legislation Program. These problems include the absence of sanctions and the lack of council responsibility in completing the Prolegnas, deadlines, changes and additions to the current Prolegnas, and technical matters related to preparing the National Legislation Program. The solution to this problem is to emphasize sanctions on legislators who do not meet the achievement threshold of 50%. The next step to improve the achievements of the National Legislation Program is to optimize the monitoring and review design as one of the Prolegnas journeys flows in the Prolegnas evaluation so that it can be used as a reference for the implementation of Prolinase in the future.