Esraa Khalaf Ali ,Prof. Dr. Ahmed Khamis Hammadi


It was found through the research that the results of the turbidity in the
wells of the study area recorded a clear discrepancy between them, as it ranged
between (11.15) mg / liter in well (2), while the lowest concentration value was
recorded in well (4), which amounted to (0.11) mg / liter. Liters. As for the pH
values in the water of the wells of the study area, there is a clear discrepancy in
the pH values in the wells of the study area, where all the values of this element
indicate that the water is basic in order to increase its value from (7) and when
comparing the pH results with the permissible determinants and standards. In it,
we find that all sites did not exceed the permissible limits, and the reason for this
is the lack of industrial activity in the region.
Also, the total hardness values reached in well (7) the highest concentration
value of (1850) mg / liter, then in well (8) it ranked second, reaching (1640) mg /
liter, and the lowest value was recorded in well (9), where it reached ( 310) mg /
liter, the electrical conductivity recorded a clear spatial variation between the wells
of the study area, as the highest conductivity values were recorded in well (6),
which reached (9.92) mg / liter, then came well (20, 15) in the second place, with
conductivity values that reached (4.56 and 4.39) mg/L for the two wells,
respectively, while well (9) recorded the lowest conductivity values among the (20)
studied wells, as the electrical conductivity value in it was (0.98) mg/L, as
evidenced by the analysis of the map (13). The clear spatial discrepancy in the distribution of electrical conductivity values between the parts of the study area