This article explores and compares the roles and functions of Sharia courts in Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Indonesia, and Malaysia. It provides an in-depth analysis of the historical background, legal frameworks, and jurisdiction of these courts in the respective countries. The study examines the similarities and differences in the implementation of Islamic law, the organizational structure of the courts, and their impact on the legal systems of each country. Special attention is given to the interpretation and application of Sharia principles, the relationship between Sharia and civil law, and the influence of these courts on social, cultural, and political dynamics. By examining these four jurisdictions, this comparative analysis aims to shed light on the diverse approaches to Sharia court systems in different Muslim-majority countries and the ways in which they navigate the complex intersection of religious and legal spheres. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the strengths, challenges, and evolving nature of Sharia courts, as well as their implications for legal pluralism and the protection of individual rights within a broader legal framework.